Have you ever looked at different bots and wondered why their pnl analysis result are different? Could it be some of these bots have incorrect results, lets analyse five different top sol telegram pnl wallet analysis bots and their results by comparing their results using one wallet address.
Time frame is a key factors that could affect different pnl result so expect bots with the same time frame (30 days analysis result or life time analysis result) to be grouped together
Lets start with 30 days analysis, Zelfiguru, walletx solana and dedge solana are all 30 days analysis result so lets begin
Zelfiguru and walletx Solana recorded the same balance, dEdge does have a record balance but rather amount spent and received which in my opinion should have been added too
Win Rate
The 3 of them have completely 3 different win rates, how can that be? 🤔 Let’s get to the bottom of it
— Zelfiguru records 50% that should be from having 1 win (green circle) and one loss (red circle)
But is it really a loss or is Zelfiguru calculation a token been held as a “loss” let’s looks even closer at the section
The wallet traded 2 tokens bought a token twice, did not sell then bought another and sold for profit, the one sold is recorded as a profitable day (green circle) the other is holding at a 40% loss but Zelfiguru still counts it a loss
So for Zelfiguru wins are wins and everything else that isn’t in current profit is regarded as a loss and lowers the winrate
WalletX Winrate
I have no idea how they got 33% 😅 I explored different possibilities but couldn’t come to a conclusion on how the number “33” happened, I also see that it does not record a bad day on the daily profits section unlike zelfiguru records holding at a loss as a bad days but it does not record holding at all, you will need to sell to be recorded as a win or loss
eEdge Winrate
Just like walletx, eEdge also doesn’t recognize coins you are still holding during thier winrate calculation so its reads 100% from the only one you which was a profitable trade (win).
In the closed trades overview section, looses is recorded as 0 which backs my claims
ROI
— eEdge sadly doesn’t have one but the other two have different ROIs and here is why, for Zelfiguru it reads -58% because it take into consideration coins being held while walletx reads 15% because it doesn’t take the tokens held into account
So eEdge and walletx don’t consider held tokens?
Yes they do, I must admit it is quite confusing, for walletx, the unrealized profit section can gives you insight on what is going on with the wallets held investment.
eEdge does not give you a direct insight but you see a 100% winrate and somehow a Net SOL of -1.365 Sol which tells you something is wrong somewhere
Summary:
They do but in a way that isn’t easy to access or understand
Average buy/sell time
The average buy/sell time is almost the same for all three
Average buy
The amount is the same for Walletx and Zelfiguru 0.81 SOL, which is more correct, the wallet bought from the range 0.9 — Sol but Eedge records 1.2 sol which is far more than it buys.
Profit
I’ll give them a pass for this, the analysis where done with few minutes interval so they probably calculated them based off how much
Unique Tokens
eEdge doe not have this but walletx and Zelfiguru do, they recorded it differently and did something quiet odd.
Zelfiguru does not count a held token with a negative pnl as a loss in the uniq. tokens section which is quite surprising as they held the wallet accountable for that trade in other sections, you can see only 1 token recorded (🟦 50%)
Walletx did NOT hold the wallet account for that trade in the daily profits calender (emoji and number) section but has two trades including they held token, recording it as a lost trade.
Which on would I recommend?
To come to that conclusion we need to go over a few things
Zelfiguru has the most accurate representation of winrate, the winrate should always put held tokens into consideration as buying tokens and holding them till dust or at a loss at the long run isn’t a “win” situation or a neutral one, it’s all loses incurred most be recorded to give a user a more accurate view of the wallet. A drawback would be the amount of information you can get from a scan
eEdge delivers a decent amount of information in a result scan, the fees overview stands out but the way the winrate is calculated invalidates the result as it affect other parts of the results like worst and best trade, as you can see it recorded that one trade that was sold only as the worst and best trade and also the average trade pnl.
Walletx offers valuable information too, I believe amongst the three, they give more results, they do have similar results with Zelfiguru when it comes to certain metrics, so what is the drawback? The entire performance metric section is confusing, I still don’t know how they got 33% on winrate and how they also calculated other metrics in that section due to not understanding how the winrate came about, that calculation is one of the most important metrics in the result as it affects other metrics and your decision so it shouldn’t be a mystery.
In conclusion
All results can be said to be accurate in their own way due to being calculated using a different method. Zelfiguru wins this round, it’s one thing to have information and another to have information I can understand, if the results are not complied in a way a user can use or complied in a way they almost seems incorrect, what’s the point.
Zelfiguru might not have a lot of metrics but they put the right things into consideration and do it the right way but nevertheless, I suggest you understand method used to calculate the results these bots use before considering using them full time.
Next Deep Dive Friday We will compare solsqueezer and Solwalletanalyser, unlike the bots we reviewed today with a 30 days result, these bots give you information on all the bots trades, see you next Friday, subscribe so you don’t miss it
